"The problem here is a totalitarian uniformity, a cult-like mentality such that even allies are enemies if they fail to follow the Exact Party Line. " - Phyllis Chesler

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Who Is Obama?



It raises questions. Big questions! Questioning a presidential candidate for the United States of America is the most patriotic thing you can do, sorry Joe the VP candidate to beg to differ with you on what YOU think is the most patriotic thing we can do for our country. Any candidate for office and any office holder of the U.S. should always be made accountable to answer such questions as he works for us and not the other way around. He is OUR employee and we are HIS CEO. Answer the questions Obamasaiah. It's really simple. Provide a valid birth certificate and put the possible conspiracy theory to rest. You owe all the people the honest and open truth about who you are, where you come from, how you were raised etc. etc...It's not racist to ask but it sure as hell raises more questions when you give the appearance of hiding something from all of us.

Update
For Immediate Release April 11, 2000 PRESIDENT CLINTON NOMINATES BERLE M. SCHILLER AND R. BARCLAY SURRICK TO THE FEDERAL BENCH The President today nominated Berle M. Schiller and R. Barclay Surrick to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. =snip= R. Barclay Surrick, of Media, Pennsylvania, has been a judge on the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, Pennsylvania, since 1978. Prior to joining the state judiciary, Surrick was a shareholder at Cramp D?Iorio McConchie & Surrick from 1969 to 1977, and worked as an associate at Lutz Fronfield Labrum & Knapp from 1967 to 1969. He also served as a part-time attorney for the Delaware County Public Defenders’ Office from 1965 to 1974, and ran a solo practice in Delaware County from 1966 to 1967. Surrick began his legal career as an associate for Basil C. Clare, Esq., from 1965 to 1966. He received his B.A. degree from Dickinson College in 1960, his J.D. degree from Dickinson School of Law in 1965, and his L.L. M. degree in judicial process from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1982.

13 comments:

Jay said...

Assuming that Obama is a Muslim, which he claims he isn't, what is so bad about that?

A New Yorker said...

Jay, Thanks for playing your part in "o" indoctrination "truth squad" today.

WRONG QUESTION! And clearly shows you didn't watch the video?

Here's a question for you though? Is your life so lacking that you feel that you are somehow filling that void of purpose by being the boot licker for "o"? Does it somehow make you feel you are somehow finally championing for something?

Get a therapist Jay!
Then actually try reading a post on my site. Here, since you are obviously so lazy that you need to be spoon fed let me give you the first to start with:
http://canubapartofmylife.blogspot.com/2008/10/who-is-irshad-manji.html

Then perhaps go and read about Ayan Hirsi Ali.

But don't ever take your lazy fat as to my blog again and try to pepper it with your "truth squad" lies.

Mariah said...

I've never seen that video before. There are so many videos out there... Thanks for sharing that one. I will definately pass that on to my parents, they will find it interesting.
THANKS

Jay said...

Hi Lauren, I'm a friend of a friend, and I never claimed to be an Obama supporter. Thanks for being an asshole, and not answering my question. Oh, people like you are exactly why McCain will lose, for better or worse.

A New Yorker said...

@Jay - I have site stats...but thanks for playing LIAR LIAR catch your pants on fire with me yet again :-p

Any friend of a friend would have just told me which friend of mine sent you to me. NEENEER NEEENEER NEEEEENER!

At worst I was snarky but you showed your potty mouth for what it was.

You're so typical of the "do it for me" kind of person. READ MY BLOG and you'd know the answer to what you insinuated about me.

A New Yorker said...

@mariah, thanks for stopping by. Glad you found value in the information I posted today.

Aleta said...

I haven't seen this eithe, Lauren. But if this is the case, why hasn't McCain jumped all over this?? I would rattle this all over the media if I knew Obama wasn't a citizen (and Muslim). I know they have 'tried.' But with proof of this nature, they should be shaking it from the rooftops!

A New Yorker said...

@Aleta - Politically it's not good for McCain to be near this and not because it's not possibly valid. But because it's a lose lose for him if he does. There's so many people who wouldn't believe it even if the courts found it to be true he'd be tared and feathered over it. Better to let others pursue this. And I can't say if it's true or not. I do know it's a real case in the courts. And I doubt it would have gotten this far if there were no merits. So we just have to wait and see. More to the point is that there are a lot of questions surrounding this man and his life that he simpy refuses to answer and THAT in itself it telling.

I post this, but err on the side of caution and post with a question as to the validity or not of it, not as proof it is.

Along with that video I purposely posted the many supporters of McCain along with their credentials and reasons in favor of McCain.

Jay said...

Lauren- I thought you were a friend of Red since you comment on his blog, but I am second guessing whether he reads your blog. Thanks for calling me a liar though, yet another assumption off the map.

Do you think all moderates on your blog are canvassing for Obama? Sorry if you were offended by my question, but you didn't answer it, and your response to me was personally offensive and extreme.

Your video made two points about Obama: not having a valid B.C., and it pointed out that he was taught in the Muslim faith as a child. I can see why the first carries some weight if it is valid, but I feel that using the Islamic stigma against Obama for political ends (as this video did) is playing on prejudice. I just wanted your take on that aspect of the video.

A New Yorker said...

@ Jay -- don't know who red is.
Ettiquette would have been nice when you're a first time commenter to state how you found me and also to just ask the question you did now.

What YOU DID instead was to insinuate that I was playing some racist montra by showing that video and that therefore I was racist and I do take offense to that.

I didn't answer your original question because it didn't appear as a real question.

However perhaps we got off to a shittay start with each other. So let's begin again. Please come back on October 30th where I HAVE answered your question you posed in your latest reply to me today.

BTW it IS a stigma when your associates are all extremists and have extremist ties. Hope to see you on the 30th again.

Jay said...

Lauren, once again, I'm very sorry, I wasn't trying to imply that you are a racist, I just wanted to know if you agreed with the stance of the video on that position. I do see that my introduction to your blog was short and unexplained, and that my original question was brief, easily misconstrued, and needed elaboration.

Red does a Friday Foto Fest, and you commented on his most recent one, so maybe I'm a friend of a stranger that you met at random.

Anyway, sorry for the upset. I'd be happy to respectfully participate in your blog.

Aleta said...

Hi Lauren, I had to come back and read the response. Yesterday Greg and I were at a restaurant with some friends and I brought up your blog and the birth certificate issue. The other party was livid about the idea that this isn't being delved into more. They believe there is a lawsuit pending on the issue, to find out if Obama is a citizen, but it isn't being made public and supposedly the lawsuit will not be addressed until after the election and THEN what?!

A New Yorker said...

@Aleta - I think it should anger all Americans. Please do see the update however. It was thrown out. But not on the merits of the case. The law is tricky. What I think is the most important thing to this story is that it wasn't covered. There was a real lawsuit brought forth and it just wasn't covered. The MSM is usually very quick to report on the slightest story without any proof of it being true or not. And yet a real lawsuit brought forth wasn't even discussed.